Many Physicians Disregard Guidelines for Helping Preschoolers with ADHD

First a few disclaimers: 1) I’m not rabidly anti-medication; it certainly has it’s uses and I’ve worked with clients to start medications as often as I’ve worked with them to discontinue them. 2) I am neither trained in prescribing medication nor do I want to be; I’m much happier collaborating with other providers who have that expertise. 3) My experience providing behavioral health services to children under 12 is limited.

According to this article, up to 90% of physicians specializing in ADHD are disregarding established American Academy of Pediatrics treatment guidelines for treating very young children (4-6 years old) suspected to have ADHD. The author indicated that AAP guidelines specify behavioral treatments (e.g., therapy) should be tried first, followed by a trial of methylphenidate (e.g., Ritalin) if behavioral treatments are not working. The researchers found that many specialists prescribed medication to preschool-age children before trying behavioral treatments, and many chose medications other than Ritalin (which reportedly has a stronger research base supporting use in younger children) for initial trials.

Of course, the AAP guidelines are just that – guidelines – and physicians are free to practice according to their own policies and professional discretion. I can imagine a number of reasons specialists might choose to disregard the the guidelines. Like many physicians, they might have limited time to collect data and thus miss crucial information. They may be facing demands from patients or parents for medication. Some may be dealing with limited access to and/or collaboration with appropriate behavioral health providers.

Regardless of explanations however, I find this alarming for a number of reasons, including that reliably diagnosing ADHD can be difficult; that behavioral treatments can be extremely helpful for many people and have distinct advantages over medication; and that medications can have significant side-effects and long-term risks.

Let’s start with a question: How do you reliably differentiate between your average 4-year-old, a 4-year-old with behavior problems, and a 4-year-old with ADHD? The DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD include signs and symptoms such as doesn’t seem to listen, loses things, is easily distracted, has difficulty waiting her/his turn, and interrupts people (full criteria can be found at behavenet.com). All of these are easily within the range of normal behaviors for this age. Additionally, acting out behaviorally is something that many kids do when stressed out or anxious (e.g., following a divorce), and behavioral issues may arise from parents’ difficulties setting boundaries, maintaining consistent rules and routines, or other family-related situations. My experience and training has been that severe ADHD is fairly recognizable, but anything less requires very careful assessment and efforts to differentiate between possible diagnoses.

Further, even if the issue really is ADHD, many people benefit from behavioral treatments including therapy and parent training courses. Children and parents can learn behavioral strategies to compensate for the challenges ADHD introduces into children’s (and families’) lives. Unlike medications, which work only as long as they are taken, these techniques will be available as coping skills throughout the children’s lives. For some, learning such skills eliminates the need for medication; others may find increasing their skills allows them to work with a physician to lower their medication dose.

Additionally, attempting behavioral treatments first may help aid diagnostic clarity. For instance, a therapist working with a family may find out diagnostically important information that the family either neglected to disclose to a physician or the physician neglected to collect. This might include recent significant stressors in the child’s life or the family that may be causing the child to act out or otherwise display ADHD-like behaviors. Alternatively, it may become clear that parental expectations for the child are skewed. I once worked with family who was convinced their child had ADHD in part because he often refused to complete the extra homework they assigned after he had dutifully completed all homework assigned at school. Finally, some parents simply find their current parenting skills overwhelmed by an active, headstrong child and can benefit from parent training to learn new skills for setting and enforcing limits, and so on.

Conversely a therapist working with a child and family can be extremely helpful in gathering confirmatory evidence for an ADHD diagnosis, including important details about what settings or times of day are most challenging for the child, and whether the child has most difficulty with attention, hyperactivity, or both. Sharing this information with the prescribing physician can be helpful in determining type of medication, dose, and timing of doses. Therapists can also help a family secure accommodations in schools, and assist parents and teachers to develop behavioral management plans when appropriate.

In contrast using medication as the first line of treatment, which the study reported 20% of specialists frequently did, can have significant drawbacks. The first I’ve already mentioned: ADHD medications – like other psychoactive drugs – have no continuing effect once you stop taking them. ADHD symptoms and challenges will likely recur soon after discontinuing the medication. If the child and/or family are not given the opportunity and encouragement to pursue behavioral treatments, they may essentially become dependent on the medication to engage in daily life.

Second, the medications come with risks for short- and long-term side effects. As I mentioned at the outset, I’m not in any way qualified to speak about these risks in depth. However, I write from my experiences with clients and note common reference material. In the short term, I’ve worked with adolescent and adult clients who complained of difficulty falling asleep or negative behavior changes (e.g., increased aggressiveness) after starting ADHD medication. Others have noted a disconcerting and difficult-to-describe sense of feeling “muted,” “muddled,” or mentally “stuffed with cotton.” With longer use, other concerns appear including growth impairment and physiological dependence. Additionally, recent media coverage of people abusing and/or becoming addicted to ADHD stimulant medications may be somewhat sensationalized, but also reflects a real risk. Just as stimulants like cocaine and methamphetamine can result in tolerance and addiction, so, apparently, can stimulant medications prescribed for ADHD. A quick search through Epocrates, a reference tool used by many medical professionals I know, lists myriad other side-effects (e.g., reactions to methylphenidate).

Third, based again on my professional experience and available references, misdiagnosing ADHD and prescribing medication can elicit or exacerbate other mental health issues including increased anxiety and agitation, psychosis, or mania. Imagine being chronically anxious and being handed a quadruple espresso. Now imagine being 4 years old without the vocabulary to describe what’s going on inside you.

Of course, when properly prescribed and monitored, ADHD medications can be extremely helpful. People often experience symptom relief much faster from medications than from behavioral treatments. Indeed, reducing the symptoms – and the personal and interpersonal stress they often produce – may be necessary for behavioral treatments to be effective. Physicians I’ve worked with have mitigated side-effects and long-term risks through carefully adjusting doses and prescribing “medication vacations” (e.g., during summer break).

In all cases, individualized, collaborative treatment plans tailored to clients’ and families’ needs, resources, and presenting problems is essential. At their best, such treatment plans involve the child, parents, physicians, medication providers, teachers and school staff, behavioral health providers, and other caregivers (e.g., daycare) as appropriate. What is clear from the study mentioned at the start of this post, is that well meaning specialists may not be following best practices for working with kids with ADHD. Parents need to be prepared to educate themselves and advocate for their children if they are going to get the best care and outcomes for their children.

Posted in psychology Tagged with: , ,

Responsible Procreation & The Gayby Boom

Lesbian Family Chalk DrawingBy now you’re probably aware that the defenders of California’s Proposition 8 have argued before the Supreme Court that the law is necessary to support “responsible procreation. In fact, that seems to be their primary justification for Prop 8. You may also have noticed that a lot of people – Supreme Court justices included – have pointed out a number of flaws in this argument, but I’d like to take it at face value for a moment.

What you may not have known (I certainly didn’t) is that the responsible procreation defense is actually an established legal argument that largely boils down to: It’s in the state’s best interest to encourage couples to form stable relationships in which to raise children, thus the legal benefits bestowed on married couples. This has some decent face validity, but in the case of Prop 8 this goal is being twisted to mean: Heterosexual people breed accidentally and can’t be trusted to provide a stable home for kids without financial incentives. If you’re hetero and feeling offended, let me normalize that emotion for you; I’m offended too. The argument goes further and suggests that, since gay people pretty much never accidentally have children, they don’t need to be encouraged to provide stable homes.

Except that gay people do have children. And they are doing so with increasing frequency. Just Google “gayby boom” and you’ll find a wealth of stories, research articles, and blog posts about the increasing number of children being born to and/or raised by gay and lesbian parents. Researchers at the Williams Institute of UCLA estimate that 6 million people in the US have an LGBT parent. They also estimate that 20% of same-sex couples are raising children under the age of 18 (roughly 220,000 kids if you’re curious).

So, yeah. Kids. Plenty of them. Now let’s consider relationship stability since that’s the other part of the responsible procreation argument. Since same-sex couples purportedly don’t need the financial benefits bestowed by marriage, it must be that they’re significantly less prone to separation or divorce, right? Wrong. Evidence from the Williams Institute, the National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study, and other sources, seems to suggest that lesbigay couples are not significantly less likely to separate than heterosexual couples. Bear in mind, the numbers are fuzzy since most states don’t allow gay marriage and thus we have no really comparable way to track gay relationships and separation. Also of note, conservatives have often cited the supposed instability of gay relationships as a reason to prevent them from adopting, fostering, bearing, or otherwise raising children.

Let’s review: We want to encourage “responsible procreation” by incentivizing couples to form stable relationships in which to raise children. Lesbigay and hetero couples are both having children and both dissolve their relationships at roughly the same rate. So tell me again why Proposition 8 is needed to protect incentives for one type of family and not the other?

Posted in culture, psychology Tagged with: ,

Mannequins, Models, & Mental Health

Image of mannequins with normal body shape

Credit: Rebecka (becka.nu)

Maybe you’ve seen this photo, currently making the rounds online, of larger-than-usual Swedish mannequins. Call them “plus-size” or “normal,” they’re generating a lot of attention from regular users and bloggers alike. You might wonder, “What’s the big deal? Why do we care so much whether mannequins (and models) reflect normal human body shape?” Perhaps it’s because the models we view seem to impact our self-esteem, often negatively.

Researchers in 2010 found that medically overweight women experienced lower self-esteem when viewing models of any size. Keep in mind, according to the National Institute of Health, 2/3 of Americans are overweight. The same researchers found that women with a normal BMI take a hit to their self-esteem when viewing models that were moderately heavy or extremely thin. In the study, only medically underweight women consistently felt good about themselves. The researchers recommended that “overweight consumers attempt to avoid looking at ads with any models, thin or heavy”.

Good luck with that in our culture, especially avoiding thinner models. According to multiple sources, the average size of mannequins in America is 4 or 6, while Tyra Banks noted that super models are now widely expected to be a size 0. In contrast, the average American woman is size 14. That means every time the average woman goes into a store, opens a magazine, or turns on the television, she’s likely to feel bad about herself. The research for men is scarcer, but suggests similar problems.

The real problem comes when you consider what often accompanies lower self-esteem: depression, anxiety, lower sense of self-worth, vulnerability to domestic violence, and other mental and behavioral health issues. Add in anorexia (the deadliest diagnosis in psychiatrists’ Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Disorders), bulimia, and general body image issues, and the question starts to look less like, “Why do we care so much?”, and more like “Why don’t we care much more than we do?”.

Psychotherapy can certainly help people address all of these issues, including improving self-image and self-esteem and helping people find ways to be more resistant to the impacts of media and marketing messages. Therapists can work with clients to be more accepting of their body shape and, when appropriate, help people develop and commit to plans for achieving better health and fitness. And, while anorexia and bulimia clearly have major medical consequences, they are most often psychological issues at their core and therefore benefit from integrating mental health counseling into the treatment plan.

As a society and culture, we can begin actively requesting that models (including mannequins) and advertisements reflect diverse, healthy human body shapes. This can be as simple as retweeting, resharing, and commenting on things like the picture above. For those interested in more direct action, consider submitting an opinion piece to your local paper, writing to your favorite fashion or lifestyle magazine, or making a comment to a manager at your favorite clothing or department store. It is possible for us to move away from a culture that glamorizes impaired health and towards one that models healthy body shapes.

Posted in culture, psychology Tagged with: , ,

Connect with me on Facebook